Golden Gate National Recreation Area
Show Project Info Back

Large-scale Preserve

Location Marin County, California, United States

Client National Park Service

Scope Planning

Size 90,000 acres

VITALS

Serves as model for national parks in urban areas

Massive environmental/cultural conservation effort accommodates rapidly growing population

90,000 acres and 59 miles of coastline

Visited by 17 million people annually

SWA led the interdisciplinary planning team

In the early 1970s, the National Park Service began the enormous task of creating a new national recreation area in the midst of an urban center—the San Francisco Bay Area, home to 4.5 million people at the time. Riding the wake of the environmental revolution of the late 1960s, the Park Service would need to find consensus among a wide range of constituents, including community members, environmentalists, landowners, and recreation advocates. It was, in the words of Park Service planner/landscape architect Doug Nadeau, a “scary prospect” that called for a new approach—an approach requiring more public participation and a more thorough environmental baseline than had ever been conceived for a national park. The willingness of the Park Service to undertake this process—and the contribution of the landscape architects who influenced their approach and led the consultant team—were crucial to the creation of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), one of the largest aggregations of public lands in a United States metropolitan area. The plan for GGNRA addressed more than 100,000 acres, 59 miles of coastline, and a wide variety of cultural landscapes. The North Sector—the subject of this submittal—was the 90,000-acre portion located north of the Golden Gate Bridge in Marin County, California, and included what is now the Point Reyes National Seashore, Mount Tamalpais State Park, and Muir Woods National Monument, as well as other portions of the Recreation Area itself. The creation of this massive park project was the culmination of a grassroots effort led by Congressman Phil Burton. Opposing the movement was the tremendous pressure for suburban development in affluent Marin County. And confusing the issue were the nature and boundaries of the proposed park itself. Unlike a remote resource such as Yellowstone and Yosemite, the GGNRA abutted urban/suburban areas and infrastructure, with ownership fragmented between Federal, State, County, U.S. Military, and corporate and private interests including agriculture. As an initial step, the Park Service departed from their tradition of in-house planning and hired a consulting team. As leaders of the interdisciplinary team selected for the North Portion, SWA began by convincing the Park Service that a complete environmental analysis and an active community involvement process would be essential to the project’s success in Marin County. The landscape architects also worked on all phases of environmental background analysis, public outreach, and park planning for the North Portion of GGNRA, and coordinated through joint planning and workshops with the team assigned to the South Portion (the park lands within San Francisco as well as Angel and Alcatraz Islands). They also developed interpretive plans and prospectuses, and resource and land management plans and options for the full 90,000-acre North Portion. The North Portion team began by assembling the first complete environmental baseline ever prepared at that time for a national park, addressing the full range of natural and cultural factors, socioeconomic considerations, land use legislation, and other elements bearing on the development of an urban park with landscape conditions ranging from ocean bluffs to towering redwood forests. Armed with this tool, the Park Service launched a highly successful and exhaustive series of over 100 educational and planning workshops involving every facet of the community, easily the most comprehensive planning ever accomplished by the Park Service at that time. After a year of workshops and focus groups, the boundaries of park management began to become clear. One common objective was clear: the public did not want urban park facilities—they just wanted a way to get to the park. This finding influenced park plans and led to collaboration between multiple agencies overseeing regional transportation. One of the most daunting tasks was assessing the remarkable range of resources that the park contained. Using the environmental baseline, the team divided the park into “land management zones” that could be related to proposed use; for instance, “intensive management zones” for natural resources, historic resources, and special-use zones, with further subdivision into specific management categories such as conservation, public access, or adaptive reuse. In contrast to the strong emphasis on cultural landscapes in the South Portion, proposals for the North Portion of GGNRA stressed natural values, with a focus on coastal environments and grasslands near the Golden Gate Bridge, redwood forests around Muir Woods, and the northern sector’s rural past including the dairy industry and the appropriate balance between woodlands and grass habitats. By end of 1979, when General Management Plan began to circulate, the GGNRA had become a model for national parks in urban areas. The tandem efforts of the landscape architects and the Park Service team enabled the resulting plan to successfully balanced resource conservation and public recreational goals from the Golden Gate Headlands to Point Reyes National Seashore. It also allowed for the gradual absorption of military installations into the park as they were phased out for military uses. The North Portion of the GGNRA preserves 50 miles of coastline and vast acres of beaches, estuaries, coastal terraces, redwood forests, farms and ranches, mountains and stream valleys, earthquake faults, historic structures, over 80 protected species, and a great variety of recreational and educational opportunities. As the western “gateway” to the national park system, the GGNRA establishes a permanent setting for the famous Golden Gate Bridge, which so dramatically links urban San Francisco with the rugged open terrain to the north, and provides residents and visitors with their first impressions of the Park Service’s ideals and values. Today the GGNRA serves an urban population of 7 million people, with 17 million visitors every year. The significance of public support can be measured by the 350,000 volunteer hours contributed to the park in the year 2000 alone, and the 14 million dollars in operational support and investments by the Golden Gate National Parks Association in that year. The North and South Portions are linked by bridge, ferry and bus transportation, implementing an original vision of the planning process. The GGNRA is a striking example of the landscape architect’s contribution on a grand scale. By studying the land and reaching out to the people, the landscape professionals of the Park Service and their consultants conceived a sustainable park that has grown over 30 years to serve the people of the Bay Area and beyond, while protecting the underlying natural and cultural resources for generations to come.

More +