A strategic approach for land conservation at a regional scale
{"autoplay":"true","autoplay_speed":"8000","speed":"1000","arrows":"true","dots":"false","loop":"true","nav_slide_column":5,"rtl":"false"}
{"autoplay":"true","autoplay_speed":"8000","speed":"1000","arrows":"true","dots":"false","loop":"true","nav_slide_column":5,"rtl":"false"}

DETAILS

LocationMarin County, California United States
ClientNational Park Service
SERVICE:
Size90,000 acres

In the early 1970s, the National Park Service began the enormous task of creating a new national recreation area in the midst of an urban center—the San Francisco Bay Area, home to 4.5 million people at the time. Riding the wake of the environmental revolution of the late 1960s, the Park Service would need to find consensus among a wide range of constituents, including community members, environmentalists, landowners, and recreation advocates. It was, in the words of Park Service planner/landscape architect Doug Nadeau, a “scary prospect” that called for a new approach—an approach requiring more public participation and a more thorough environmental baseline than had ever been conceived for a national park. The willingness of the Park Service to undertake this process—and the contribution of the landscape architects who influenced their approach and led the consultant team—were crucial to the creation of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), one of the largest aggregations of public lands in a United States metropolitan area.

The plan for GGNRA addressed more than 100,000 acres, 59 miles of coastline, and a wide variety of cultural landscapes. The North Sector, featured here, is the 90,000-acre portion located north of the Golden Gate Bridge in Marin County, California, and includes what is now the Point Reyes National Seashore, Mount Tamalpais State Park, and Muir Woods National Monument, as well as other portions of the Recreation Area itself.

Unlike a remote resource such as Yellowstone and Yosemite, the lands of GGNRA abutted urban/suburban areas and infrastructure, with ownership fragmented between Federal, State, County, U.S. Military, and corporate and private interests including agriculture.

The approach SWA developed for the full 90,000-acre North Portion involved the first complete environmental baseline ever prepared at that time for a national park, addressing the full range of natural and cultural factors, socioeconomic considerations, land use legislation, and other elements bearing on the development of an urban park with landscape conditions ranging from ocean bluffs to towering redwood forests.

Armed with this tool, the Park Service launched a highly successful and exhaustive series of over 100 educational and planning workshops involving every facet of the community, easily the most comprehensive planning ever accomplished by the Park Service at that time. After a year of workshops and focus groups, the boundaries of park management began to become clear.

One common objective was clear: the public did not want urban park facilities—they just wanted a way to get to the park. This finding influenced park plans and led to collaboration between multiple agencies overseeing regional transportation. One of the most daunting tasks was assessing the remarkable range of resources that the park contained. Using the environmental baseline, the team divided the park into “land management zones” that could be related to proposed use; for instance, “intensive management zones” for natural resources, historic resources, and special-use zones, with further subdivision into specific management categories such as conservation, public access, or adaptive reuse. In contrast to the strong emphasis on cultural landscapes in the South Portion, proposals for the North Portion of GGNRA stressed natural values, with a focus on coastal environments and grasslands near the Golden Gate Bridge, redwood forests around Muir Woods, and the northern sector’s rural past including the dairy industry and the appropriate balance between woodlands and grass habitats.

By end of 1979, when General Management Plan began to circulate, the GGNRA had become a model for national parks in urban areas. The tandem efforts of the SWA as consulting landscape architects and the Park Service team enabled the resulting plan to successfully balanced resource conservation and public recreational goals from the Golden Gate Headlands to Point Reyes National Seashore.  It also allowed for the gradual absorption of military installations into the park as they were phased out for military uses.

The North Portion of the GGNRA preserves 50 miles of coastline and vast acres of beaches, estuaries, coastal terraces, redwood forests, farms and ranches, mountains and stream valleys, earthquake faults, historic structures, over 80 protected species, and a great variety of recreational and educational opportunities. As the western “gateway” to the national park system, the GGNRA establishes a permanent setting for the famous Golden Gate Bridge, which so dramatically links urban San Francisco with the rugged open terrain to the north, and provides residents and visitors with their first impressions of the Park Service’s ideals and values.

Today the GGNRA serves a Bay Area population of nearly 8 million people, with more than 12.4 million visitors in 2020.  The North and South Portions are linked by bridge, ferry and bus transportation, implementing an original vision of the planning process. The GGNRA is a striking example of a landscape architect’s contribution on a grand scale. By studying the land and reaching out to the people, the landscape professionals of the Park Service and their consultants conceived a sustainable park that serves the people of the Bay Area and beyond, while protecting the underlying natural and cultural resources for generations to come.

Related Projects

Martin Luther King Jr. Square Water Quality Demonstration Park

The City of Conway received both local and federal grants to create a water quality demonstration park in a flood-prone, one-block area of its downtown to educate the public about Low Impact Development (LID) and Green Infrastructure (GI) methods and how they can enhance water quality. The project will transform this remediated brownf...

Freedom Park Master Plan

Despite Freedom Park’s rich history as a site of protest in late 20th-century Atlanta, proximity to vibrant destinations, and vast, bucolic open space, the site has suffered from indistinct identity, unclear boundaries, unsafe pedestrian crossings, low biodiversity, limited placemaking, and minimal programming. SWA’s master plan ushers a new era in ...

Dubai Hills Boulevard and Public Realm

Envisioned as a garden oasis strategically situated where city meets desert, Dubai Hills will be a vibrant yet elegant mixed-use community for 21st-century living. The key public realm element of this massive 1,000-hectare development is a 5.6-kilometer urban boulevard lined with shops, residences, and offices along the district’s central spine. SWA/Balsley de...

Sanshan Hillside Park

Sanshan New Town, a fast-rising urban development in Foshan City’s Nanhai District, is full of hope and vitality. In the New Town’s center lies Sanshan Hillside Park, composed of three hills known respectively as Big Pine Forest, Central Hill, and Liangangwei Hill. This area is envisioned to become an “urban forest” park with diverse programs and distinctive f...

Elk Grove Civic Center

SWA’s design for this community resource improves upon part of a 56-acre master plan with a civic center campus set within a beautiful park, and an added public outdoor commons. The pedestrian-friendly commons weaves new buildings together with mature trees and an outdoor living space linking together a community center, an aquatics center, and a future librar...

Buffalo Bayou Park

This thoroughly renovated, 160-acre public space deploys a vigorous agenda of urban ecological services and improved pedestrian accessibility, with two new bridges connecting surrounding neighborhoods. The design utilizes channel stabilization techniques, enhancing the bayou’s natural meanders and offering increased resiliency against floodwaters while preserv...

Freedom Park Master Plan

Despite Freedom Park’s rich history as a site of protest in late 20th-century Atlanta, proximity to vibrant destinations, and vast, bucolic open space, the site has suffered from indistinct identity, unclear boundaries, unsafe pedestrian crossings, low biodiversity, limited placemaking, and minimal programming. SWA’s master plan ushers a new era in ...

Hermann Park

Hermann Park is one of Houston’s great civic resources containing a significant urban forest and many public venues. It is the flagship of the Houston Park system, serving the recreation needs of the City’s diverse population of some four million and welcoming over six million visitors a year. However, like many urban parks in America, much of Hermann Park has...